We’ve talked a lot in the last year about ITIL practice areas, ‘real world’ ITIL business problems and ITIL implementation challenges.  Now my question to all of you ITIL professionals out there is, are you ready to rock and roll?

 We’re experiencing incredible growth here at Evergreen and we’re actively recruiting all types of ITIL, ITSM, ServiceCenter and AssetCenter professionals.  We’re looking for:

  • Senior ServiceCenter Solutions Architect
  • ServiceCenter Consultant
  • AssetCenter Consultant
  • ITIL Consultant
  • Project Manager
  • IT Software Sales Consultant, SE
  • IT Software Sales Consultant, SW
  • Director of Professional Services

If you’re interested you can check out all of our new positions at:

http://www.evergreensys.com/company/careers/openings/

 As an HP Software ‘Gold’ partner, we’re developing our staff towards increasing capabilities in HP’s comprehensive suite of BTO (Business Technology Optimization) products that include all of the legacy Peregrine ServiceCenter and AssetCenter products, as well as the powerful legacy Mercury applications.

We know that good ITIL professionals are sought after right now, so sometimes candidates ask me, “Why should I work for Evergreen?”  This is what I tell them:

  • We have an open and honest environment where we share the truth with our employees.  We hold an all hands “Town Hall” meeting every quarter to share our progress and challenges. Employees can ask any question — and get a straight answer.
  • We have a culture of collaboration where we foster teamwork and deliver excellence. Our technical staff shares their knowledge and works together to meet tough challenges. 
  • Our professionals focus on excellence and press the envelope to improve results for our clients. For proof you can just look at our website and the kinds of “real” research our team delivers.
  • You can work on your career, doing what you like and growing your skills.  We’ll make sure your skills stay current, by maintaining your certifications at the latest levels.
  • You can have a work/life balance at Evergreen. Travel is part of life in consulting, but we constantly strive to balance the needs of clients with what is best for our team so you can do what you enjoy and still have a life.
  • We have excellent compensation and benefits.

I encourage you to check us out more on our web site ( http://www.evergreensys.com ) and if you think your skils match our requirements email us at careers@evergreensys.com

I’m looking forward to hearing from you!

Don


Posted in: ITIL Implementation  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

We’ve been talking lots lately about Change management, so I have a question for all of you out there who feel like all you do is fight fires.

How many Changes does your organization make per month? Now think of the impact on the business. Are you pushing more than 500 changes per month? Do you feel like you’re fighting fires instead of preventing them?

If this is a topic on your mind, then I hope you’ll join me tomorrow, October 16 at 10AM (PDT) 11AM (MDT) 12PM (CDT) and 1PM(EDT) for our HP and Evergreen sponsored webinar on Change Management – taking it from firefighting to fire prevention.

Register for the webinar and learn how to Take Change Management from Firefighting to Fire Prevention.

The agenda includes:

• Best practices on Change control lifecycle management.
• Change acceleration with reduced complexity, cost and increased ROI.
• Real-world success stories on managing Change.
• Optimization of CAB efficiency and effectiveness.
• A fast tour demo of HP’s integrated ServiceCenter, Change Control Management and uCMDB bundle.

Change will also be address in the context of workflow analysis, CI (configuration item) collision and the importance of a universal CMDB.

Hope you’ll be able to join us!

Don


Posted in: Change Management  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DonCasson posted on September 28, 2007 22:06

We’ve been talking about change lifecycle management lately, so I thought it might be interesting to dissect the components of Change.

Key improvements in Change Management can be found in four phases – planning, approval, execution and review.  Most organizations tend to spend all their time in execution but there are valuable opportunities for improvement in other areas that are often overlooked.

In the area of Change Management planning, typical improvements come from:

  • raising the bar for change approval (saying no to changes that are not justified).
  • empowering those requesting the change to plan it.
  • matching level of effort in change planning with the materiality of the proposed change.
  • clarifying and communicating expectations related to change submission completion and lead times.

Most potential for gain in the Change Management Approval area will be uncovered by discussing the Change Approval process with those handling the IT Change Approval process.  Typical improvements come from:

  • streamlining and routing approval processes based on risk and materiality.
  • reducing approval activities by screening out unqualified requests.
  • reducing time required by standardizing and improving the quality of the requests.
  • planning work more efficiently by raising compliance with submission lead time standards.

Execution changes most often involve improving efficiencies by breaking down organization, process and communication barriers around ‘silos’ in IT. Typical improvements come from streamlining and reducing complexity by grouping similar workflows and reducing them to a manageable number. For example, all server upgrades are ‘essentially’ the same, yet many organizations have completely different workflows for each type of server platform.

Executing via common workflows makes the work of IT less customized and more replicable. Gains in efficiency, simplicity, accuracy and service quality are common, along with reductions in cost and risk. These improvements come from

  • filtering approval processes based on the risk and materiality of the proposed change.
  • reducing approval activities by screening out unqualified change requests.
  • reducing work time required by standardizing and improving the quality of the requests.
  • planning work more efficiently by getting staff to comply with change submission lead time standards.

The most potential for gain in the area of Change Management Review is usually uncovered by discussing the Change Review process with those performing the review work. For most organizations, effective change review is the most neglected change activity.

Changes that do not fail, but don’t perform well for some reason or other are rarely reviewed. Changes that fail during execution or illustrate themselves as software failures are obvious and should be considered separately. More subtle changes need to be examined separately and root causes examined. Changes that cause serious failures, often evidenced by unplanned downtime or worse, usually do receive in-depth analysis. These often result in major systematic course corrections, but only after the fact, when high costs have been incurred. Red flags should go up for changes that fail during initial execution, but more subtle changes should be investigated thoroughly as well. Many IT organizations operate reactively and thus ignore these more subtle changes, spending the majority of their time on reactive analysis.

Typical improvements come from better change review activities that reduce the number of failures and also reduce the number of changes that fail in execution, thereby reducing the number of ‘near’ failures.

Analysis of the findings in Change Management from the perspectives of basic re-engineering of key, high-volume workflows and key improvement points in each of the four phases of the Change Management lifecycle should point out clear opportunities for business value improvement. These include improvements in service quality, efficiency, accuracy and agility, and reductions in risks and costs.

Register for Evergreen Systems’ Change Management Webinar: Take Change Management from Firefighting to Fire Prevention.

- Don


Posted in: Change Management  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

We hear a lot of talk these days about KPAs and ITIL process areas. KPAs (Key Process Areas) are used to help develop and measure the benchmarked standards of ITIL and are a good way of measuring your organization’s ‘maturity’ level within an ITIL process area (such as Configuration Management

KPAs apply to a repeatable maturity level. In the Infrastructure Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL), a repeatable maturity level means that the most important processes have been introduced and the effective structure of the IT process in question is predictable, and the provision of its IT-related services is repeatable.

So what about KPAs associated with Configuration Management? The main purpose of Configuration Management is to establish and maintain the integrity of products that are subject to or part of IT services. Configuration Management involves the identification of the relevant hardware and software components that need to be put under configuration control. Changes to the configuration are evaluated with respect to the service level agreement and with respect to possible risks for the integrity of the configuration.

A Configuration Management plan covers the Configuration Management activities to be performed, the schedule of the activities, the assigned responsibilities, the resources required (including staff, tools and computer facilities) and the CM requirements and activities to be performed by the service delivery group and other related groups

With all these things in mind, you may be able to develop and benchmark your Configuration Management KPAs using the following questions. Remember that each question has three possible answers of (1) consistently (2) inconsistently (3) never. Which category your answers fall into will quickly steer your assessment of configuration management maturity as either consistent (repeatable), inconsistent or having no organized approach

Try your hand at some of these questions and see how your organization ranks against best practices.

Keep up the good work until next time.

Also, Don’t forget to register for Evergreen’s change management webinar: Take Change Management from Firefighting to Fire Prevention

Don

  • Is a Configuration Management plan prepared for each service according to a documented procedure?
  • Is a documented and approved Configuration Management plan used as the basis for performing the Configuration Management activities?
  • Is a Configuration Management library system established as a repository for the configuration base lines?
  • Are the products to be placed under Configuration Management identified?
  • Are action items for all configuration items/units initiated, recorded, reviewed, approved, and tracked to closure according to a documented procedure?
  • Are action items for all configuration items/units initiated, recorded, reviewed, approved, and tracked to closure according to a documented procedure, by an automated process or toolset?

Posted in: CMDB  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DonCasson posted on August 21, 2007 22:54

So you’ve thought things through now and you think you’re ready to begin working on a CMDB. Whether your motives are centralized change management control, the need for a standard set of configuration items or just improved change governance – you know the organization needs it.

The next question is where to start. As the white rabbit told Alice in ‘Alice in Wonderland’ – “I’ve always found it’s helpful to start at the beginning.”

So start at the beginning - by developing a strategy, one that surveys the industry, defines the critical elements of your CMDB and tailors the process to meet the needs and IT ‘maturity’ of your organization. Who knows, you might even want to develop a ‘model’ that could provide a roadmap towards your desired ‘end state’?

So here are a few ideas about how to ‘start at the beginning’ by developing your CMDB Strategy:

  • Review current ITIL Change and Configuration Management ‘best practice’ thinking.
  • Review ‘whitepapers’ written by some of the sectors’ leading CMDB software and solution vendors. Just remember that some of the white papers are written by vendors that may have an agenda.
  • Review the functional attributes critical to the implementation of a CMDB and evaluate them against the ‘fit’ with your business.

Attributes that you may want to consider include:

  • Reconciliation (the ability to rationalize one or more instances of a CI that is discovered and determine that they are the same item and that their relationships are identified are accurate.)
  • Federation (which enables multiple data sources to be brought together to represent a coalesced view of a defined level of data.)
  • Mapping and Visualization (which provides the ability to illustrate logically and physically the hierarchical and peer-to-peer relationships between CIs.)
  • Synchronization (which provides the ability to update the CMDB with approved changes).

Next time we’ll discuss benchmarking your organization against industry best practices. Until then, remember, start at the beginning…

Don

Also, don’t forget to register for Evergreen’s change management webinar and learn how to Take Change Management from Firefighting to Fire Prevention

Are you trying to build a business case for a CMDB? Download Evergreen’s newest white paper on the subject: “The Business Case for Change and Configuration Management and the CMDB”.

—–


Posted in: CMDB  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Last blog I talked about CMDB and its relationship to overall Service Level Management. What about is relationship to ITAM and Asset Management?

Oftentimes enterprises believe that if they have an asset management database, they also have a CMDB database. There is a fundamental difference and an important link.

IT Asset Management is the discipline of managing finances, contracts and usage of IT assets throughout their lifecycles for the purpose of maintaining an optimal balance between business service requirements, total costs, budget predictability and contractual and regulatory compliance. ITAM activities include the management of inventory, software licenses, vendors, procurement, leases, warranties, cost accounting, retirement and disposal.

The goal of Configuration Management, on the other hand, is to provide a logical model of the IT infrastructure that is accessed by all ITIL processes, the purpose of which is to drive consistency among them. Configuration activities include identifying, controlling, maintaining and verifying the versions of configured items (CIs). CI information should be stored in a single repository, or a Configuration Management Data Base (CMDB).

So here’s the link - the only difference between a given component in an asset management database or a CMDB is whether it is considered an ‘asset’, a ‘CI’ or both. The difference is only determined by what you do or plan to do with that component.

A component should be considered an ‘asset’ if you decide it is worth managing a contract, cost or usage attribute, throughout its lifecycle. In other words, does that component have an asset that is calculated ‘on the books’, such as software licenses or hardware maintenance contracts?

A component is considered a ‘CI’ if you decide it is worth managing operationally for incidents, problems, changes, releases, capacity, etc.

So there are three points to my ramblings:

  • If the same component can classified as both an asset and a CI, it can be managed for both administrative and operational purposes.
  • An asset management database is an important underpinning to the development of CMDB database.
  • ITAM and ITIL’s best practice Configuration Management share the need for reliable data about components in the IT environment. Thus discovery tools (a scalable means of keeping accurate data on deployed components) and a CMDB (a repository for reconciling and accessing the discovered data) can serve both ITAM and Configuration Management.

ITAM and ITIL are both key IT improvement processes and all IT processes that rely on and contribute to CIs are dependent upon an accurate CMDB to provide best practice service level management.

So I’ll say it again- what is good for the CMDB is good for ITIL and overall service level management. And it starts with an asset management database.

So what do you think?

Don

Also, don’t forget to register for Evergreen’s change management webinar and learn how to Take Change Management from Firefighting to Fire Prevention

Are you trying to build a business case for a CMDB? Download Evergreen’s newest white paper on the subject: “The Business Case for Change and Configuration Management and the CMDB”.


Currently rated 5.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

In my last blog I laid out the proposition that Configuration Management and a CMDB is all about Change and that CMDB and Change are ‘partners’ in executing the work of IT efficiently and accurately. Seems pretty clear, right? Then it should be easy to justify and implement a CMDB based on large numbers of Changes, right again?

Not necessarily. Justifying, developing and implementing a CMDB is not an isolated activity, a technology implementation or a database development effort. A CMDB is a means to an end, not an end in itself, and the end(s) are increased ITIL best practice Change Management and control and increased Configuration and Release Management control.

So the business value of a CMDB has to be built on results achieved in other ITIL practice areas, including an improved Change and Configuration Management process, better Change control and overall better service level management. These objectives have to quantified to prove metrics that could include:

  • Business process re-engineering
  • Change Management lifecycle improvements
  • Change Management approval board activities
  • Change and Configuration Management executions
  • Metrics to support and make the case for improved Change and Configuration Management and the CMDB

Ultimately the CMDB should be profiled as a crucial tool to the improvement of overall ITIL best practice Service Level Management and an important underpinning to an accurate and effective Asset Management system.

A good CMDB is good for Change, Configuration and Release management and ultimately good for the entire ITIL Service Level Management process.

Do you agree?

Until next time,

Don

Also, don’t forget to register for Evergreen’s change management webinar and learn how to Take Change Management from Firefighting to Fire Prevention

Are you trying to build a business case for a CMDB? Download Evergreen’s newest white paper on the subject: “The Business Case for Change and Configuration Management and the CMDB”.


Posted in: Business Value of IT , CMDB  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Is the business value of a CMDB all about Change Control? And what if your organization performs root cause analysis? Do you really need a CMDB? We’ll address these and other CMDB, Change and Configuration Management issues in a new series of blogs this month.

As enterprises and their IT support organizations grow, their infrastructures become increasingly fragmented and spread across a variety of functions, technologies and organizations. As this IT infrastructure ‘sprawl’ continues, efficiency, optimization and overall control over IT resources suffers. Organizations often address the IT infrastructure ‘sprawl’ issue with automated or, in some cases manual, Change ‘root cause’ analysis tools. These tools analyze changes, in many cases failed changes, to get at the ‘root cause’ of the problem.

Although root cause analysis is critical to the improvement of change control, analysis that doesn’t take into account all configuration items (CIs) and their inter-relationships can be reactive, incomplete and in some cases, downright ineffective. Spreadsheets and manually maintained asset and specific purpose configuration repositories also do not sufficiently take into account the inter-relationships of CIs and can fall far short of effective root cause analysis for complex IT infrastructures.

So here’s my proposition - change process and CMDB are ‘partners’ in executing the work of IT efficiently and accurately. At the highest level, change is the workflow of IT and the CMDB is the information store that provides data to support the decision-making process. This partnership is the functionality that drives an efficient change flow engine.

Until next time,

Don

Also, don’t forget to register for Evergreen’s change management webinar and learn how to Take Change Management from Firefighting to Fire Prevention

What do you think about the relationship between Change and Configuration Management? Download Evergreen’s newest white paper on the subject: “The Business Case for Change and Configuration Management and the CMDB”.


Posted in: Business Value of IT , CMDB  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DonCasson posted on June 14, 2007 22:55

ITIL introduced the CMDB several years ago yet many are confused about its purpose. Do you think you know what a CMDB really is, as well as it’s purposes, components and applications? Test your CMDB knowledge against these five very common misconceptions about the CMDB.

The common misconceptions detailed here include:

  • A CMDB is just a database
  • A CMDB enables ITIL
  • CMDB is just a part of Change Management
  • My Asset Management system is the same as a CMDB
  • Federation is the key to CMDB

  1. A CMDB is a database
    A CMDB, despite the name, is not (just) a database. It is an analysis tool that happens to use an internal database to maintain configuration state and snapshots. A unique feature is that the database is populated by auto-discovery instead of business transactions.
  2. A CMDB enables ITIL
    This can be a confusing phrase. A CMDB is a trusted source of configuration or structural information. Controlling the ITIL workflows and collecting process metrics is managed by a separate workflow, forms and dashboard tool.
  3. CMDB is part of Change Management
    Change Management uses the CMDB analysis and report capability to identify rogue changes, simulate the impact of proposed changes and confirm releases. CMDB is an important tool for automating the Change Management process. A CMDB implements the ITIL Configuration Management process.
  4. My Asset Management system is the same as a CMDB
    Asset management is a database and set of processes to acquire and track equipment and software to perform financial and custodial duties such as ownership, location, license utilization, lease terms, disposal. Asset management is not concerned with configuration structure and mapping relationships. But an Asset Management system and process is both a good idea on its own, and an important prerequisite to development of a CMDB.
  5. Federation is the key to CMDBFederation is fiction. It is a term to hide the fact that no vendor wants (or is able) to solve the overall data integration problem across the disparate and standards-free world of IT tools. A CMDB does not have to federated to be effective as long as the Configuration Items (CIs) follow consistent naming rules. Later it may be useful to integrate selected attributes about CIs from other systems, such as application monitoring, security, and asset management.

Want to know more about how to develop your own CMDB? Download our comprehensive white paper on nine steps to developing an effective CMDB.

Also, don’t forget to register for Evergreen’s change management webinar and learn how to Take Change Management from Firefighting to Fire Prevention

—–


Posted in: CMDB  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DonCasson posted on June 5, 2007 21:48

One of the single most common reasons ITIL projects fail to launch (or crash mid-stream) is due to management’s inability to clearly articulate (and then prove) the business value of “doing” ITIL. Budget dollars are hard to come by these days and requesting funding for a multi-year project where the ROI is fuzzy at best is not something most managers are eager to bet their futures on.

Well, there may be some help with the recent release of ITIL v3.

V3 claims to take a more pragmatic, business view of IT Service Management, addressing ITSM from a more “strategic” perspective. Specifically, a major tenant of v3 is the idea of the Service Lifecycle. Managing services form an end-to-end perspective with a particular focus on the financial aspects of delivery is a major focus. This “Service Portfolio” approach should resonate well with upper level management and business executives. It certainly as them spending money to improve project management practices.

On the surface, this sounds like good news, huh? Add to this some additional v3 highlights that are also business focused and you might actually have something you can sell. These highlights include:

  • Viewing ITIL in terms of its value in supporting compliance requirements - (SOX, Basle II, etc.)
  • ITIL is aligned more tightly with “business usage “
  • v3 creates the basis for a Balanced Scorecard approach to measuring success
  • v3 significantly improves the ability to measure and tie back improvement in process to “value” to the business
  • Processes are treated as secondary to the idea of the “Service Lifecycle”
  • Closer ties to other industry standards such as ISO/IEC 20000
  • Provides additional assistance for organizations who have to manage outside service providers (can help manage and control costs)

Will these enhancements be enough to convince the yet-to-be convinced that ITIL is worth the effort and that it truly can drive real and measurable business value? That remains to be seen. However, it is a step in the right direction and it shows that the authors of ITIL v3 are aware that for ITIL to really take hold here in the US, executives must be able to see the value before they take the ITIL plunge!

IT organizations at last have the customer-centric view of IT Service Management that is essential to improving the relationship between IT and the customer and their alignment with the business overall.

ITIL v3 is decidedly more strategic, focused on services and less process oriented. The focus on the Service Lifecycle means that there are guidelines for end-to-end service management, including guidance on Service Economics.

So what does this mean to your ITIL adoption initiative, and at what point do you implement your Service Portfolio and Service Catalog?

If you take a close look at ITIL V3, you’ll see specific emphasis on the idea of Service Portfolio Management. And while it is a positive step for ITIL to begin looking at IT Service Delivery from a lifecycle and financial perspective, it does make you wonder how this idea of Service Portfolio Management related to traditional Portfolio Management. (which is typically project based).

Bottom line on this one – in order for an organization to have a complete picture of IT activities (for planning, budgeting, and control purposes), they must have a handle on both Project and Service Portfolio Management disciplines.

Want to know more about the business value of ITIL? Check out our whitepaper: Developing the Business Case for ITIL.


Posted in: ITIL Implementation  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Search

Calendar

«  March 2010  »
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
22232425262728
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234
View posts in large calendar